Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Rethinking tumour bed boost irradiation after pathological complete response in breast cancer.

Created on 27 Oct 2026

Authors

Carlotta Giandini, Maria Grazia Carnevale, Riccardo Ray Colciago, Serena Di Cosimo, Maria Carmen De Santis

Published in

Tumori. Pages 3008916261497221. Oct 27, 2026. Epub Oct 27, 2026.

Abstract

Tumour bed boost irradiation has long represented a cornerstone of breast-conserving treatment, improving local control at the cost of increased fibrosis, poorer cosmetic outcomes, and reduced quality of life. However, the landscape of early breast cancer has changed profoundly. Modern systemic therapies and the widespread adoption of neoadjuvant treatment have made pathological complete response (pCR) an increasingly common and clinically meaningful endpoint, consistently associated with excellent long-term outcomes.Despite this biological revolution, local treatment strategies remain largely unchanged and continue to follow standards developed in the pre-neoadjuvant era. Yet, pCR likely reflects not only treatment efficacy but also favourable tumour biology and intrinsic radiosensitivity, raising the question of whether all patients who achieve pCR still derive a meaningful incremental benefit from routine tumour bed boost irradiation. As survivorship becomes an increasingly important outcome, minimizing treatment-related toxicity without compromising local control is a major priority. Prospective trials evaluating response-adapted boost strategies are therefore urgently needed. Radiotherapy should evolve alongside systemic therapy, moving from a 'one-size-fits-all' approach toward truly biology-driven personalization.

PMID:
42935229
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement