Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

FMCW Radar Micro-Doppler UAV Classification via Compact Depthwise CNN and Offline Temporal Logit Fusion.

Created on 27 Oct 2026

Authors

Haida Yang, Qiang Lin, Yu Yao, Lijuan Wang

Published in

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). Volume 26. Issue 20. Oct 21, 2026. Epub Oct 21, 2026.

Abstract

Frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar micro-Doppler signatures provide informative motion cues for small unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) classification, but independent single-window predictions can vary across neighboring time windows. This study evaluates a compact scratch-trained depthwise convolutional neural network (CNN) with a deterministic three-channel observation interface and a parameter-free offline temporal logit fusion stage under a recording-disjoint six-class protocol. The classifier contains 52,918 trainable parameters; temporal fusion is applied only as final post-processing, without retraining or increasing model size. Across three recording-disjoint folds and three model seeds, the proposed three-channel single-window setting achieved 98.35±0.90% macro-F1, compared with 97.67% for a repeated-channel reference. Applying short-neighborhood fusion with K=3 further increased mean macro-F1 to 98.60%. A seven-configuration per-channel ablation shows that no single channel accounts for this gain, and an expanded subset with varied modulation periods, frequency bands, and nominal ranges provides initial evidence on sensitivity to radar acquisition parameters. These results indicate that the proposed observation interface improves over simple channel repetition, while offline temporal aggregation provides a small additional gain for the compact classifier within the evaluated held-out-recording protocol.

PMID:
42944518
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 18
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement