Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

An Entropic Value-at-Risk-Inspired Load-Balancing Routing Algorithm for LEO Satellite Networks.

Created on 27 Oct 2026

Authors

Shuqi Wang, Huizi Guo, Weijie Deng

Published in

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). Volume 26. Issue 20. Oct 19, 2026. Epub Oct 19, 2026.

Abstract

In sixth-generation (6G) space-air-ground integrated networks, risk-neutral reinforcement-learning-based routing methods for low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks remain susceptible to severe tail latency. To address this issue, this paper proposes a novel Entropic Value-at-Risk (EVaR)-inspired routing algorithm with risk regularization for low-return actions. The routing process in an LEO satellite network is formulated as an event-driven partially observable Markov decision process. Within a multi-agent soft actor-critic framework, an EVaR-inspired state-level risk proxy for low-return actions is introduced and incorporated into the actor loss as a risk regularizer. This design enables the joint optimization of expected routing returns and the mitigation of low-return action risk. Simulation results obtained in a simplified LEO network using Iridium orbital parameters demonstrate that, compared with the multi-agent soft actor-critic algorithm, the proposed algorithm reduces the average end-to-end delay and the 99th-percentile end-to-end delay by 19.2% and 32.9%, respectively. It also reduces the average and maximum queueing delays by 79.4% and 57.0%, respectively, with approximately no packet loss observed during the simulations. These results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm enables efficient and reliable routing in LEO satellite networks under high-load conditions.

PMID:
42944490
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement