Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Trustworthy Stress Detection from Wearable Sensor Signals for Preventive Anxiety Monitoring: Subject-Independent Accuracy and Calibrated Confidence with the Autonomic-Branch Quantum-Graph Network.

Created on 27 Oct 2026

Authors

Spyridon Papamentzelopoulos, Sotirios Nikoletseas

Published in

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). Volume 26. Issue 20. Oct 11, 2026. Epub Oct 11, 2026.

Abstract

Wearable monitoring of autonomic dysregulation preceding anxiety disorders must generalize to unseen wearers; reported accuracy reflects the evaluation protocol as much as the model. We measured it with one fixed instrument, the Autonomic-Branch Quantum-Graph Network (AB-QGN), mapping each autonomic branch onto one named qubit of a shallow entangling circuit. With architecture and features fixed, heart-rate variability (HRV) and electrodermal (EDA) features from WESAD and SWELL-KW went through leakage-free subject-grouped and leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) protocols and two leaky ones: single-modality configurations inflated by 27-61 macro-F1 points. Honest fused macro-F1 was 86.2 (WESAD) and 61.4 (SWELL-KW), 84.0 and 55.1 under LOSO; that distance from near-ceiling figures is the result, not a shortfall. Leakage corrupted confidence: conventional calibration left a gradient-boosting baseline at 25.6% expected calibration error, 5.4% after subject-disjoint refitting. Over structure- and parameter-matched classical twins, the quantum core added 3-12 session-level points on SWELL-KW at every seed, not significant at 51 sessions, and none on WESAD when parameter-matched. On a third corpus, AffectiveROAD, honest performance is at chance per window, while window-overlap leakage lifts tree ensembles to 90-98 macro-F1. We claim no advantage over fixed-configuration tree ensembles: the contribution is an auditable encoder and the protocol needed to trust a number.

PMID:
42944289
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement