Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A Possibility-Space Derivation of a Planck-Softened Correlation Kernel for Holographic Entropy Deficit.

Created on 27 Oct 2026

Authors

Aaron Adair

Published in

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland). Volume 28. Issue 10. Oct 17, 2026. Epub Oct 17, 2026.

Abstract

I derive a Lorentzian correlation kernel from a maximum-entropy principle on an abstract possibility space, assuming no spacetime or field theory. Maximizing Shannon entropy over positive phase rates at fixed mean gives p(ω)=Ω-1e-ω/Ω, and averaging relative phase coherence yields ρ(σ)=1/(1+Ω2σ2). Given a posited array of pairwise comparison intervals, classical multidimensional scaling returns a screen, its metric, and its dimension; the dimension is an output, and the test can fail, which makes the existence of a geometry falsifiable in principle. A postulated finite invariant speed supplies the Lorentzian cone. Under a stated locality assumption the Fisher coordinate of the ensemble is a shift-symmetric scalar that admits no potential within the Fisher sector; with Lovelock's theorem this gives Gμν+Λgμν=(8πG/c4)Tμν, with the coupling normalized thermodynamically and G an input. A Gaussian treatment of the patches solves for the correlation scale, giving λG≃1.302ℓP. Treating Planck patches as binary variables on a square lattice instead sets λ=2ℓP, the largest scale binary patches can realize, before any entropy comparison. At that scale the maximum-entropy Ising multi-information agrees with 1-1/(4ln2)=0.6393, the Bekenstein-Hawking deficit, within 0.05%: transfer-matrix bounds give 0.6135, and 0.6389 under one assumption; a pre-registered extrapolation gives 0.6391. No anti-de Sitter asymptotics are used.

PMID:
42940864
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement