Completeness of Excision and Persistent Residual Disease in Retrorectal Cysts: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors

Arda Sakir Yilmaz, Necdet Fatih Yasar, Mahmut Kebapci

Published in

The American surgeon. Pages 31348261501628. Oct 27, 2026. Epub Oct 27, 2026.

Abstract

BackgroundRetrorectal cysts are rare congenital lesions with malignant potential, and incomplete excision may result in persistent residual disease. Factors associated with persistent residual disease after surgical excision remain poorly defined.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 23 patients diagnosed with retrorectal cystic lesions between 2009 and 2024. Demographic, radiological, surgical, histopathological, and follow-up data were analyzed. Among the 16 surgically treated patients, median follow-up was 39 months (range, 12-60).ResultsThe cohort included 16 women (69.6%) and 7 men, with a median age of 49 years. Diagnosis was based on CT in 14 patients (60.9%) and MRI in 9 (39.1%). Sixteen patients underwent surgery: 6 underwent open transabdominal resection, 5 laparoscopic resection, and 5 posterior (Kraske) resection. Postoperative complications occurred in 6 patients (37.5%), including wound complications, seroma, bleeding, and urinary dysfunction; no postoperative mortality was observed. Histopathology showed tailgut cyst components in most cases and in both malignant lesions. Persistent residual disease was identified in 5 patients (31.3%). Retrospective review of preoperative imaging demonstrated previously existing cystic components that had not been completely excised, most commonly adjacent to the levator ani muscle.ConclusionComplete excision of all cystic extensions may be more important than the surgical approach in preventing persistent residual disease. Careful preoperative MRI assessment, recognition of extensions near the levator ani muscle, and meticulous surgical planning may help reduce the risk of persistent residual disease.

PMID:
42945147
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.