Authors
Sarah Petelinsek, Olivia Pearson, Rowan Kelner, Boomer Olsen, Nikki Champion, Kailey Mahoney, Peilu Zhang, Scott E McIntosh, Patrick G Hughes
Published in
Wilderness & environmental medicine. Pages 10806032261498049. Oct 28, 2026. Epub Oct 28, 2026.
Abstract
Study HypothesisThe primary objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a novel instrument called the Backcountry Risk-Taking Instrument (BRiT) to measure risk-taking behavior among backcountry users. We aimed to create an instrument that is content-valid, grounded in theory, and psychometrically sound.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate the psychometric properties of the instrument. Participants completed the newly developed 13-item instrument along with established measures of risk-taking behavior and risk preference to assess convergent validity.ResultsA total of 361 participants completed the survey. After listwise deletion, n = 280 were retained for factor analysis and n = 354 for convergent validity. The resulting instrument provides a concise, empirically supported framework for measuring backcountry risk behavior and establishes a foundation for prospective validation in future cohorts.ConclusionsThe BRiT instrument significantly advances avalanche risk assessment. BRiT demonstrates a clear and stable foundation built upon 3 domains: Core Gear, Avalanche History, and Terrain Choice. Continued validation and refinement across broader populations will strengthen its utility as a foundational tool for both research and applied avalanche risk management.
PMID:
42949403
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Oct 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 14
- Comments 0