Implementing sustainability in gynecologic surgery: barriers and a roadmap for change.

Authors

Evelyn F Hall, Amanda E Dilger, Tsung Mou

Published in

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology. Volume 38. Issue 6. Pages 482-488. Dec 01, 2026. Epub Oct 27, 2026.

Abstract

Healthcare generates more than 4% of global greenhouse gas emissions, and the operating room is a disproportionate contributor. Gynecologic surgery is an important target for interventions as a high-volume specialty heavily reliant on disposable trocars, energy devices, and custom packs. Despite growing calls to action and evidence that selected sustainability initiatives can be implemented without compromising patient safety, adoption remains inconsistent and often dependent on local champions.
Barriers span five domains: (a) Organizational and structural obstacles including limited governance, hierarchical decision-making, inconsistent regulatory guidance, and supply chains favoring single-use products. (b) Knowledge and training gaps persisting across perioperative teams and hospital leadership, compounded by the lack of standardized environmental metrics. (c) Cultural resistance reflecting safety concerns about reusables despite demonstrated clinical equivalence. (d) Operational barriers including inadequate infrastructure and upfront costs preceding potential savings. (e) Intervention-specific challenges that limit implementation of waste segregation, reusable transitions, anesthetic gas management, and energy efficiency.
Addressing these barriers requires leadership commitment, clearer regulatory guidance, ongoing education, industry collaboration, stakeholder engagement, and context-specific application of implementation science and quality-improvement methods. Standardized metrics, institution-specific targets, and ongoing monitoring can support phased implementation, track progress, and build institutional support for sustained change.

PMID:
42952302
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.