Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

QUIET Care: A Nursing-Led Conceptual Analysis of Alarm-Related Acoustic Burden in Adult Critical Care.

Created on 29 Oct 2026

Authors

Abdalkarem Fedgash Alsharari, Mostafa Shaban

Published in

Nursing in critical care. Volume 31. Issue 6.

Abstract

Adult intensive care units (ICUs) generate a persistent acoustic burden from alarms, care activity, equipment and communication. This burden can undermine patient rest and contribute to alarm fatigue, cognitive workload and distress among nurses.
To present a nursing-led conceptual framework for addressing alarm-related acoustic burden in adult critical care.
Literature-informed conceptual analysis. A structured purposive evidence map was audited using two PubMed searches run on 9 September 2026 (3377 unique records after PMID deduplication) and citation checking. Twenty-nine selected sources were charted against the five domains. This was not a systematic review; no original data, formal consensus or framework validation was undertaken.
QUIET Care proposes five connected practice domains: quantify and qualify the sound environment; use patient-specific monitoring and alarms; integrate quiet into workflow; engage people and culture; and track, test and learn. It treats the domains as locally adaptable hypotheses and requires explicit safety balancing measures.
QUIET Care is a pragmatic proposal for local co-design and evaluation, not a validated intervention or universal sound target.
The framework may help critical care nurses and leaders organise source mapping, alarm customisation, workflow redesign, team ownership and small safety-monitored tests of change while preserving the audibility of urgent alerts.

PMID:
42952127
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement