Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Beyond the cusp of cochlear implant sound processor obsolescence: what do cochlear implant users and their families think, feel, and do about their ageing sound processors?

Created on 29 Oct 2026

Authors

Jermy Wai-Yin Pang, Paola Vittoria Incerti, Jessica Imogen Tsiolkas, Pádraig Thomas Kitterick

Published in

International journal of audiology. Pages 1-14. Oct 28, 2026. Epub Oct 28, 2026.

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) provide essential auditory access for people who are deaf or hard-of-hearing. Over time, however, sound processors (SPs) become obsolete. For older adults, technological decline can influence communication, participation, and well-being. Understanding these impacts is important for informing clinical care and upgrade pathways.
This qualitative sub-study (within a broader mixed-methods study) as part of a broader evaluation of clinical- and economic outcomes associated with upgrading obsolete processors, which captured the perspectives of CI users and their communication partners. Semi-structured interviews were conducted remotely, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Fifteen CI users and seven communication partners were recruited through purposive sampling.
Themes described gradual challenges associated with ageing processors, including reduced reliability, emotional strain, and relational impacts. Following upgrade, participants reported greater communicative ease, renewed participation, and reduced family burden.
Findings highlight the functional, psychosocial, and relational implications of SP obsolescence and underscore the importance of integrating lived experience into long-term CI care planning.

PMID:
42952198
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement