Authors
Yasaman Vali, Kristy Wonders, Jenny Lee, Guruprasad P Aithal, Rocio Aller, Michael E D Allison, Johanna Arola, Jesus M Banales, Vanesa Bernal-Monterde, Annalisa Berzigotti, Jérôme Boursier, Clifford A Brass, Elisabetta Bugianesi, Jose Luis Calleja, Jeremy F Cobbold, Helena Cortez-Pinto, Javier Crespo, Susan Davies, Ann Driessen, Kevin L Duffin, Mattias Ekstedt, Daniel Forton, Céline Fournier-Poizat, Sven Francque, Andreas Geier, Joseph Gogain, Annette S H Gouw, Hannes Hagström, Adriaan G Holleboom, Prodromos Hytiroglou, Morten Karsdal, Carolin Lackner, Diana J Leeming, Luca Miele, George Papatheodoridis, Valerie Paradis, Michael Pavlides, Juan M Pericàs, Salvatore Petta, Vlad Ratziu, Manuel Romero-Gomez, Jörn M Schattenberg, Detlef Schuppan, Rambabu Surabattula, Ana Paula Silva, Mette Skalshøi Kjær, Beate K Straub, Gianluca Svegliati-Baroni, Dina Tiniakos, Maria Manuela Tonini, Richard Torstenson, Luca V C Valenti, Joanne Verheij, Jeremy Magnanensi, Rebeca Mayo, David Wenn, Hannele Yki-Järvinen, Carla Yunis, Patrick M Bossuyt, Quentin M Anstee, LITMUS Investigators
Published in
Lancet (London, England). Volume 408. Issue 10566. Pages 1850-1865. Oct 31, 2026.
Abstract
The advent of regulatory-approved pharmacological treatments for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) calls for precise, non-invasive biomarkers that facilitate early diagnosis, support therapy selection, and aid clinical trial enrolment. The European multicentre LITMUS study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a broad range of non-invasive biomarkers for identifying patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), at-risk MASH, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis.
In this prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy study, adults with biopsy-confirmed MASLD were prospectively recruited across 13 countries in Europe and the USA. We assessed 12 single markers and 18 multimarker panels. The reference standard was centrally scored liver histology according to the non-alcoholic steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network Scoring System. Target conditions included MASH (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score ≥4 with ≥1 point per component), at-risk MASH (MASH plus significant fibrosis [fibrosis stage F≥2]), advanced fibrosis (F≥3), and cirrhosis (F4). Performance was evaluated by area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with the minimum acceptable criterion (MAC) of AUC higher than 0·80 to indicate potential biopsy replacement.
Between Jan 1, 2018, and June 30, 2023, we analysed data from 1590 participants with centrally scored liver biopsies and at least one biomarker measurement; 609 (38%) had biopsy-confirmed at-risk MASH, 678 (43%) had MASH, 585 (37%) had advanced fibrosis, and 164 (10%) had cirrhosis. For detecting at-risk MASH, SomaSignal showed the highest diagnostic performance (AUC 0·83 [95% CI 0·80-0·85]), significantly exceeding MAC, whereas no other test reached the MAC for MASH only. For advanced fibrosis, SomaSignal showed the highest performance (AUC 0·92 [0·90-0·94]), followed by FibroMeter-VCTE (AUC 0·87 [0·83-0·92]), Agile 3+ and TSP2 (both AUC 0·84 [0·82-0·86]), and NIS4 (0·82 [0·80-0·85]). For cirrhosis, FibroMeter-VCTE showed the highest diagnostic performance (AUC 0·94 [0·90-0·97]) followed by SomaSignal (AUC 0·92 [0·90-0·94]), followed by Agile 3+ (0·88 [0·85-0·91]), Agile 4 (0·87 [0·84-0·90]), ADAPT (0·85 [0·81-0·88]), and ELF, LSM-VCTE, and TSP2 (all 0·84 [0·81-0·87]). Sequential two-step approaches using gamma-glutamyl transferase as a first-line test met the MAC for both advanced fibrosis and at-risk MASH.
Although single markers resulted in variable and limited performance when compared to histology for detecting at-risk MASH, multimarker panels showed great potential, with a proteomic panel showing strong diagnostic performance. These findings could support the selection and implementation of non-invasive testing strategies in MASLD and inform future clinical guidelines, regulatory evaluation, and clinical trial design.
Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking.
PMID:
42956772
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Oct 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 14
- Comments 0