Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparing precutting endoscopic band ligation-assisted resection vs ESD for small gastric SMTs: a randomized controlled trial.

Created on 30 Oct 2026

Authors

Youping Zhou, Mingfeng Liu, Rui Yuan, Yu Ou, Xiaofeng Yang, Haojie Zhang, Yichun Yang, Binglan Zhang, Shan Li, Liang Deng

Published in

Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver. Oct 29, 2026. Epub Oct 29, 2026.

Abstract

This study evaluated the clinical feasibility of precutting endoscopic band ligation-assisted resection (precutting EBLR) for the removal of small gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria (gSMT-MP).
This was a single-center, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial (ChiCTR2200065473). All endoscopic procedures were performed by two experienced endoscopists (>300 ESD cases each). From January 2023 to December 2024, consecutive patients with gSMT-MP ≤ 16 mm were enrolled and randomly assigned to precutting EBLR or ESD. The primary outcome was operation time, additional clinical indicators were also collected and analyzed.
The median operation time was 17.5 min (range: 12-50) for the precutting EBLR group and 30 min (range: 12-80) for the ESD group. The median operation costs were $564.05 (range: $301.97-$1236.42) and $849.29 (range: $491.95-$2121.25), respectively. R0 and en-bloc resection were achieved in all patients. No delayed perforations or tumor recurrences occurred during follow-up.
Precutting EBLR demonstrated advantages in operation time compared with ESD. It represents an efficient and safe endoscopic approach for treating gSMT-MPs ≤ 16 mm, and may be potentially applicable in non-academic or lower-volume centers, pending further validation.

PMID:
42957495
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 39
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement