Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cost-effectiveness of neoadjuvant/adjuvant pembrolizumab versus standard of care for locally advanced head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma in China and the United States.

Created on 31 Oct 2026

Authors

Ruixuan Liu, Zhen Wang, Xueli Yang, Yong Xiao, Zeqin Liu, Qing Yang

Published in

Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research. Oct 30, 2026. Epub Oct 30, 2026.

Abstract

The KEYNOTE-689 trial demonstrated clinical benefits of perioperative pembrolizumab in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC), but its economic value remains uncertain.
A partitioned survival model evaluated neoadjuvant/adjuvant pembrolizumab (two 200 mg neoadjuvant cycles and fifteen 200 mg adjuvant cycles every 3 weeks) plus standard of care (surgery and postoperative radiotherapy ± cisplatin) versus open-label standard of care alone over a 30-year horizon from Chinese and US payer perspectives. Efficacy, severe adverse events (AEs; grade ≥ 3 stomatitis, cytopenias), utilities, and direct medical costs (2025 USD) were synthesized. Subgroups were stratified by PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS).
In the overall population, pembrolizumab was not cost-effective in either the US (ICER, $212,183.93/QALY) or China ($114,422.43/QALY). In the US, ICERs were $142,495.35/QALY for CPS ≥ 1 and $127,668.80/QALY for CPS ≥ 10, below the $150,000/QALY threshold, with cost-effectiveness probabilities of 57.5% and 49.2%, respectively. In China, all subgroup ICERs exceeded the $40,334/QALY threshold.
Perioperative pembrolizumab may offer economic value for selected US patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 or ≥10, although substantial decision uncertainty remains. It was not cost-effective in China or in the overall population under current pricing.

PMID:
42961801
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 31 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement