Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Attention, not scale, drives human-AI alignment in multimodal language prediction.

Created on 31 Oct 2026

Authors

Viktor Kewenig, Andrew Lampinen, Samuel A Nastase, Christopher Edwards, Quitterie D'Elascombe, Akilles Richardt, Jeremy I Skipper, Gabriella Vigliocco

Published in

NPJ artificial intelligence. Volume 2. Issue 1. Pages 84. Epub Jul 07, 2026.

Abstract

Humans routinely draw on visual context to predict upcoming words. To what extent current vision-language models produce comparable behaviour is unclear. Here, we placed five state-of-the-art pretrained systems side-by-side with 600 human participants in a web-based Visual-World Paradigm. On each of 100 six-second movie clips, models and participants received either text-only or synchronised video + text and judged how likely a specified target word was to appear next; human eye movements were tracked throughout. Adding visual context increased model-human alignment in predictability ratings across all architectures (average Δr ≈ 0.18) with no impact of parameter size. When visual context was informative, transformer attention significantly increased alignment. Attention maps from two transformer models corresponded with human gaze, explaining up to 70% of the inter-participant variance when the scene contained informative cues. Notably, cross-modal attention reliably tracked anticipatory human fixations on semantic cues. These results suggest that current transformer-based vision-language models can approximate human behaviour exploiting visual context during language prediction-and that selective attention to informative cues, not sheer model scale, is the principal driver of this alignment.

PMID:
42964312
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 31 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement