Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Two suspected sequential retinal arterial macroaneurysms in a single eye with secondary nonvascular cystoid macular edema: 5-year follow-up: a case report.

Created on 31 Oct 2026

Authors

Kaiyao Chi, Daoxi Lei, Tong Guo, Xiaoding Shui, Huili Li

Published in

Frontiers in medicine. Volume 13. Pages 1953333. Epub Oct 16, 2026.

Abstract

Retinal arterial macroaneurysm (RAM) is an acquired vascular disorder. The long-term natural history of multiple RAMs in a single eye complicated by nonvascular cystoid maculopathy (NVCM) is rarely documented.
A 65-year-old hypertensive woman presented with acute vision loss in her left eye secondary to severe vitreous hemorrhage. She underwent pars plana vitrectomy with intravitreal recombinant tissue plasminogen activator thrombolysis and silicone oil tamponade. Postoperative multimodal imaging supported the diagnosis of two suspected sequential RAMs confined to the left eye. Over a 5-year follow-up, the two lesions exhibited divergent outcomes: one developed fibrosis and persistent NVCM associated with severe initial hemorrhage and inadequate blood pressure control, whereas the other regressed completely following rigorous systemic hypertension management.
Multiple RAMs within the same eye can follow distinctly divergent natural courses. In this single case, early blood pressure control appeared to be an important contributing factor to the divergent lesion outcomes, although the contribution of spontaneous regression and other confounding factors cannot be excluded. Multimodal imaging is indispensable for differentiating NVCM from vasogenic macular edema, guiding individualized conservative management, and preventing unnecessary interventions.

PMID:
42964198
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 31 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement