Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Suboptimal Reading Experience in Adulthood: Evidence From Readers With Dyslexia and Neurotypical Readers With Basic Literacy.

Created on 02 Nov 2026

Authors

Tânia Fernandes, Mariona Pascual, Margarida Cipriano, Susana Araújo

Published in

Journal of learning disabilities. Pages 222194261494573. Nov 02, 2026. Epub Nov 02, 2026.

Abstract

This study investigated the weighting of phonological and orthographic processes in readers with two forms of suboptimal reading experience. Experiment 1 tested basic literacy (BL) in adults who acquired reading in childhood or adulthood (early vs. late literate: EL vs. LL). Experiment 2 examined developmental dyslexia (DYS) in college students relative to age-matched controls (AC). In both experiments, participants performed the same tasks: a reading fluency task on high- and low-frequency words and pseudowords, allowing the analysis of word frequency and lexicality (words vs. pseudowords), and a lexical decision task that orthogonally manipulated word frequency, lexicality, and length. In Experiment 1, relative to LL, EL showed stronger orthographic processing, reflected in larger lexicality effects and smaller length effects for words than pseudowords in the lexical decision task. In Experiment 2, readers with DYS showed larger word-frequency and length effects than AC, particularly in the lexical decision task. They also showed reliable length effects for both words and pseudowords, albeit smaller for words. The apparent behavioural similarity between EL and adults with DYS seems to reflect different mechanisms: relatively strong orthographic processing despite limited print exposure in EL, but fragile orthographic representations despite extensive print exposure in adults with DYS.

PMID:
42969083
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Nov 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement