Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

AxialTAD: an axial contrast architecture for TAD boundary prediction from Hi-C.

Created on 02 Nov 2026

Authors

Woo-Young Choi, Je-Keun Rhee

Published in

Briefings in bioinformatics. Volume 27. Issue 6. Nov 02, 2026.

Abstract

Topologically associating domains (TADs) are fundamental units of 3D chromatin organization, and accurate identification of TAD boundaries from Hi-C contact matrices remains an active challenge. Recent deep learning approaches have advanced substantially, but these rely on increasingly large architectures, raising the question of how much of this capacity boundary-centric analysis requires. Here we propose AxialTAD, a compact deep learning model centered on an Axial Contrast Module (ACM) that explicitly encodes directional contrast in contact intensity along the row and column axes of local Hi-C patches, an operator aligned with the geometric signature of TAD boundaries. Evaluated on four human cell lines (GM12878, HeLa-S3, IMR-90, K562) within cell lines and under leave-one-cell-out generalization, AxialTAD performed comparably with a recent convolutional neural network (CNN)+Transformer baseline (deepTAD) while using 76%-80% fewer trainable parameters (113K-137K versus 571K). A parameter-matched conventional CNN achieved similar F1 to AxialTAD in the human 25 kb experiments. When trained and evaluated within each of two mouse datasets, AxialTAD outperformed both this control and deepTAD. Orthogonal validation against CTCF and cohesin ChIP-seq supported the biological plausibility of the predicted boundaries. These results indicate that, within the range of architectures examined, a large architecture is not necessary to reach this level of boundary prediction.

PMID:
42969852
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Nov 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement