Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Complementary Yield of Gene Panel Testing and ACMG SF v3.3 Screening for Cardiovascular Disease in a Korean Cohort.

Created on 03 Nov 2026

Authors

Jihye You, Lae-Young Jung, Sun Hwa Lee, Joonhong Park

Published in

Clinical genetics. Nov 02, 2026. Epub Nov 02, 2026.

Abstract

Inherited arrhythmia syndromes and cardiomyopathies are genetically heterogeneous, and clinical exome sequencing (CES) for unrelated indications increasingly yields cardiovascular secondary findings (SFs) under the ACMG SF v3.3 list. We compared, at a single Korean centre, phenotype-directed cardiac gene panel testing with opportunistically ascertained cardiovascular SFs. Forty patients with suspected inherited arrhythmia or cardiomyopathy underwent a 19-gene arrhythmia or 173-gene cardiomyopathy panel with AI-assisted, manually reviewed variant classification; separately, 288 patients undergoing CES for unrelated indications were screened for ACMG SF v3.3 cardiovascular pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. A phenotype-concordant pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant was found in 8/40 patients (20.0%), including a recurrent KCNQ1 p.Arg231His variant in two unrelated infants and a MYBPC3 variant upgraded to pathogenic by co-segregation in a mother-son pair. Among the 288 exome-sequenced patients, 17 reportable cardiovascular SFs occurred in 16 (5.6%), predominantly dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 7, mostly TTN) and familial hypercholesterolaemia (n = 6, including a recurrent PCSK9 p.Glu32Lys variant in three patients). The two approaches sampled largely non-overlapping gene categories and are complementary rather than competing; recurrent, population-specific variants underscore the need for population-informed interpretation and structured counselling in cardiovascular genetic diagnosis.

PMID:
42971754
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 03 Nov 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement