Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Is it tuberculosis or chronic pulmonary aspergillosis? Diagnostic challenges, consequences of misdiagnosis, and potential solutions in resource-limited settings.

Created on 03 Nov 2026

Authors

Bahareh Bagheri, David W Denning, Alfred Botha, Pamela Ncube, Samantha L Sampson

Published in

Clinical microbiology reviews. Pages e0019524. Nov 03, 2026. Epub Nov 03, 2026.

Abstract

SUMMARYChronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is most often caused by Aspergillus fumigatus and carries significant mortality and morbidity. While the diagnosis of CPA is often delayed, the emergence of CPA among patients with a concurrent or previous history of mycobacterial disease presents a challenge for CPA diagnosis. When patients previously treated for mycobacterial diseases present with new symptoms, it is often unclear whether these symptoms are due to a recurrence of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infection, CPA, co-infection, or another of several other differential diagnoses. Consequently, PTB patients can be misdiagnosed as having smear/GeneXpert-negative PTB. We address these challenges, given the different associated mortality and morbidity of NTM, PTB, and CPA. We proposed a new algorithm to guide clinicians in ruling CPA in or out in both newly diagnosed smear/GeneXpert-negative and NTM patients and those with a previous history of mycobacterial disease. We also recommend follow-up screening of those with a high risk of developing CPA following their PTB/NTM treatment. Implementing screening strategies, such as performing end-of-treatment TB chest X-rays and Aspergillus-specific IgG tests during and at the end of mycobacterial therapy, could facilitate the early diagnosis and treatment of CPA and alleviate associated mortality and morbidity.

PMID:
42975123
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 03 Nov 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 22
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement