Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Association between dynamic balance and change‑of‑direction performance in athletes: A systematic review and three‑level meta‑analysis.

Created on 03 Nov 2026

Authors

Ruyun Wang, Zhijian He, Dapeng Bao, Limingfei Zhou

Published in

Journal of sports sciences. Pages 1-21. Nov 03, 2026. Epub Nov 03, 2026.

Abstract

Dynamic balance is considered relevant to change-of-direction (COD) performance in athletes, but evidence remains inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis quantified this association and examined whether it varied by balance test direction, movement plane, COD angle, and sex. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 31 December 2025. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. Thirteen observational studies involving 722 athletes were included. A small but significant negative correlation was observed between dynamic balance and COD completion time (r = -0.217, p = 0.006). Heterogeneity was substantial and mainly attributable to between-study differences (I2 = 65.9%). Balance test direction significantly moderated the association (p < 0.001). Significant small negative correlations were observed for frontal-plane (r = -0.277, p = 0.002) and 45° diagonal-plane balance (r =  -0.192, p = 0.023), but not sagittal-plane balance. Tests limited to anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions showed a medium correlation (r =  -0.329, p < 0.001). COD angle and sex were not significant moderators. These findings suggest that dynamic balance should be assessed alongside direct COD testing and other relevant capacities.

PMID:
42975096
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 03 Nov 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement