Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Validating Time-Series Regression Model Predictions of Influenza Mortality: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.

Created on 04 Nov 2026

Authors

Jessie J Goldsmith, David J Price, Katherine B Gibney, Patricia Therese Campbell, Sheena G Sullivan

Published in

Influenza and other respiratory viruses. Volume 20. Issue 11.

Abstract

In Australia, non-pharmaceutical interventions introduced early in 2020 to curtail the spread of COVID-19 resulted in the temporary elimination of influenza. We used data from this influenza-free period (2021) to validate influenza mortality burden predictions from time-series models.
Time-series models were parameterised with routinely collected health data from 2010 to 2019 (pre-pandemic) and from 2010 to 2019 plus 2021 (pandemic-inclusive). These models were used to predict influenza A- and influenza B-associated mortality rates in Queensland between 2010 and 2019. Mortality estimates were made in persons < 65 and ≥ 65 years for pneumonia and influenza (P&I) and respiratory illnesses as contributory mortality causes and for all-cause mortality.
The models predicted consistent mortality rates for influenza B. However, the pandemic-inclusive model for individuals ≥ 65 years predicted influenza A-associated P&I mortality of 32.1 per 100,000 person-years (95% prediction interval [PI]: 25.9, 39.6), significantly higher than the pre-pandemic model estimate of 17.6 (95% PI: 13.4, 23.6). A similar, non-significant difference occurred for respiratory mortality.
These results suggest that time-series modelling may underestimate the true burden of influenza-A mortality among the elderly. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding and establish the conditions under which the time-series regression approach may be reliable.

PMID:
42977265
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Nov 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement