Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Development and temporal validation of a machine learning-based model for predicting intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing robot-assisted urological tumor resection: A retrospective study.

Created on 04 Nov 2026

Authors

Haoyu Liu, Yunhui Chen, Xue Yang, Tianqi Pan, Shouyan Wang

Published in

Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine. Pages 9287329261505518. Nov 04, 2026. Epub Nov 04, 2026.

Abstract

BackgroundIntraoperative hypothermia (IOH) is prevalent in robotic urological surgery, yet existing prediction models, largely based on linear methods, may have limited capacity to capture complex non-linear risk patterns.ObjectiveTo develop and validate a preoperative machine learning model for predicting IOH to guide individualized thermal management.MethodsWe analyzed 787 patients (2022-2024) undergoing robot-assisted urological tumor resection. A CatBoost model was developed using 2022-2023 data with 5-fold nested cross-validation for robust feature selection. Independent temporal validation was conducted using 2024 data.ResultsThe model, utilizing 17 preoperative predictors, demonstrated temporal generalization with a temporal validation AUC of 0.877 and precise calibration (slope = 0.964). SHAP analysis highlighted markers of physiological stress and metabolic reserve as key drivers. Decision curve analysis confirmed positive net benefit across a broad probability threshold (10%-90%).ConclusionsThis robust machine learning tool accurately identifies high-risk phenotypes using only baseline characteristics. It enables clinicians to implement proactive, personalized warming strategies before anesthesia induction.

PMID:
42979898
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Nov 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement