Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A high robustness decoding technique for ultrasound modulated electroencephalogram.

Created on 05 Nov 2026

Authors

Xue Wang, Guowei Chen, Jia He, Pu Wang, Rongxu Guo, Shenjie Ji, Mingyu Li, Feng He, Yanqiu Zhang, Xiqi Jian, Hao Zhang, Minpeng Xu, Dong Ming

Published in

Science advances. Volume 12. Issue 45. Pages eaei1954. Nov 06, 2026. Epub Nov 04, 2026.

Abstract

Ultrasound-modulated electroencephalography (USMEEG) has become a vital tool in neuroscience because it integrates millimeter-level spatial resolution with millisecond-level temporal resolution. However, under extremely complex scenarios, excessively strong or weak acoustoelectric signal coupling leads to severe distortion in USMEEG decoded signals. To address this, we developed a highly robust decoding algorithm based on the ultrasound pulse repetition frequency and introduced the acoustoelectric modulation ratio (AMR) to quantify different modulation scenarios. Across numerical simulations, phantoms, and validation using human steady-state visual evoked potential signals with data-level acoustoelectric coupling across 10 volunteers, the focused ultrasound phased array achieved an encoding spatial resolution of 0.79 millimeters. The proposed algorithm significantly outperformed four traditional methods, exhibiting higher precision under weak modulation (0 < AMR ≤ 0.6), moderate modulation (0.6 < AMR ≤ 1), and over modulation (AMR > 1) conditions, with average decoding correlations reaching 0.84, 0.90, and 0.89. This highly robust technique expands USMEEG applications and provides a technical foundation for high-performance noninvasive brain-computer interfaces.

PMID:
42981385
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Nov 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement