Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Systemic Therapies for Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety.

Created on 06 Nov 2026

Authors

Gema Sánchez Sáez, Francisco José Gómez García, Juan Antonio Ruíz Roca, Fe Galera Molero

Published in

Oral diseases. Nov 05, 2026. Epub Nov 05, 2026.

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of systemic pharmacological and nutritional interventions for recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS).
Following PRISMA 2020, five databases were searched for studies published from 2001 to 2026. Clinical trials and analytical observational studies of systemic treatments for RAS were included. Risk of bias was assessed using design-appropriate tools. Owing to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized qualitatively.
Twenty studies were included: 16 randomized trials, three non-randomized intervention studies, and one observational cohort. Interventions included corticosteroids, colchicine, thalidomide, levamisole, pentoxifylline, dapsone, clofazimine, sulodexide, montelukast, roflumilast, rebamipide, vitamin B12, vitamin C, multivitamins, zinc, and omega-3 fatty acids. Several therapies improved pain, ulcer burden, healing, or recurrence-related outcomes, but comparative evidence was inconsistent. Thalidomide showed potential benefit but important safety limitations and a high risk of bias. Nutritional interventions showed mixed results.
Selected systemic therapies may benefit severe, frequent, or refractory RAS, but no intervention can be considered clearly superior. Evidence certainty is limited by heterogeneity, small samples, limited direct comparisons, and risk of bias.

PMID:
42989707
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Nov 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement