Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[Therapeutic Intensity Level Scale: Development and Use for Clinical Decision-Making in a University Hospital].

Created on 11 Nov 2026

Authors

M Garcia-Retortillo, M J López Casanova, S Mínguez Masó, A Zapatero Ferrándiz, M Sala Serra, C Farriols Danés

Published in

Journal of healthcare quality research. Volume 42. Issue 2. Pages 101253. Nov 10, 2026. Epub Nov 10, 2026.

Abstract

To develop and implement a therapeutic intensity level (NIT-Mar) scale in a hospital consortium and evaluate its use.
Adaptation of a therapeutic intensity scale through an expert panel and subsequent evaluation based on a retrospective observational study in patients who died from SARS-CoV-2 infection between March and June 2020 in a university hospital consortium. The following were analyzed: clinical characteristics, use and change of the scale, consensus in decision-making, and concordance between the assigned therapeutic intensity level and the therapeutic measures applied.
A total of 210 patients were included, with 74.8% assigned a NIT. No significant differences were found in age, gender, or comorbidities between patients with and without NIT. Decision-making consensus was achieved in 87.9% of cases, mainly among professionals (77%) and families (72.6%), but only in 12.7% with the patient. In 49.7% of cases, the NIT was modified during hospitalization. Concordance between the assigned NIT and applied treatments was 85.3%.
The NIT-Mar scale was widely used from its implementation, facilitating decision-making in high-demand healthcare settings. Its flexibility allowed adjustments in therapeutic intensity according to patient evolution. This tool can improve communication between teams, care planning and patient safety.

PMID:
43008380
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Nov 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement