Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Component-Specific PM2.5 Exposure and Arthritis Risk in China: Evidence of Differential Susceptibility in a National Cohort.

Created on 11 Nov 2026

Authors

Xiuhua Yan, Lidan Hu, Zhiyuan Li

Published in

GeoHealth. Volume 10. Issue 11. Pages e2025GH001702. Epub Nov 10, 2026.

Abstract

While fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a recognized environmental hazard, the specific contribution of its chemical components to arthritis risk remains poorly characterized. To address this critical gap, this study leverages a large, nationally representative longitudinal cohort of middle-aged and older Chinese adults (14,935 individuals) to provide novel insights into the distinct contributions of specific PM2.5 components to arthritis risk, and to identify the most hazardous components and vulnerable populations. Using advanced statistical models (mixed-effects logistic regression and quantile g-computation), we demonstrate for the first time the distinct toxicities of key PM2.5 components-organic matter (OM), black carbon (BC), sulfate (SO4 2-), nitrate (NO3 -), and ammonium (NH4 +)-on arthritis prevalence. Our results confirm that both short- and long-term exposure to PM2.5 mass and specific components (OM, BC, SO4 2-, and NH4 +) significantly increase arthritis risk. Furthermore, with unprecedented granularity, we identified that males and individuals with overweight/obesity are particularly vulnerable. These findings provide a crucial advancement in environmental epidemiology, moving beyond total PM2.5 mass to pinpoint the most harmful components. They underscore the dual public health strategy of targeting emission sources of PM2.5 chemical components in China.

PMID:
43011787
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Nov 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement