Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Beyond Automatic Reminders: Adaptive Layered Communication Strategies to Sustain Young Adult Engagement in a Longitudinal Intervention Study.

Created on 12 Nov 2026

Authors

Yusi Aveva Xu, Jace D Pierce, Lenna Dawkins-Moultin, Ashley Canright, Maria Borjas, Dalnim Cho, Suellen Hopfer, Yisheng Li, Lois M Ramondetta, Qian Lu

Published in

Journal of health communication. Volume 31. Issue sup1. Pages S5-S20. Epub Nov 12, 2026.

Abstract

Digital health interventions offer promising opportunities for behavioral change among young adults, but maintaining longitudinal trial engagement is difficult. This study examined the adaptive layered communication strategies (ALCS) developed collectively through aniterative loop with community members in the Student Health Initiative for Eliminating HPV Diseases (SHIELD) study. These strategies included welcome videos, personalized messages (e.g., thank-you texts, birthday messages, exam period check-ins), and memes. Compared to the period/phase before ALCS, participants exposed to ALCS demonstrated significantly higher survey completion rates at 6 months (76.09% vs. 60.51%, p = .01) and 9 months (78.08% vs. 65.64%, p = .05). Moderation analyses revealed a phase×school type interaction (p = .04): completion rose from 50.05% to 75.95% among public school students (p = .03), while private school rates remained stable ( > 75.00%), suggesting a ceiling effect (p = .41). While automated reminders remain valuable, researchers developing longitudinal digital health interventions should consider a "cocktail" approach, which combines reliable automation with authentic, timely, and culturally tuned human touches, to sustain engagement, particularly in lower-engagement contexts (e.g. public schools).

PMID:
43018254
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Nov 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement