Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Establishing functional mouse primary nasal epithelia in the air-liquid interface to study bacterial infection.

Created on 13 Nov 2026

Authors

Yang Su, Maiya Callender, Maor Bar-Peled, Eric T Harvill, Thomas Krunkosky

Published in

Scientific reports. Volume 16. Pages 37492. Epub Jul 31, 2026.

Abstract

Nasal epithelia are amongst the first lines of defense against airway infections. Development of a robust ex vivo nasal epithelia model will enable further mechanistic study of pathogen-upper airway interaction. While the current human nasal epithelia models are limited by their availability and ethical constraints, there is a lack of a robust mouse nasal epithelia model. Here, we developed a functional mouse primary nasal epithelia (MNE) model in an air-liquid interface (ALI). We described an intriguing property of MNE to lose confluence and trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) when initially exposed to ALI conditions, which explains the prior challenges in the development of MNE. Our novel procedure employed two cycles of growth and differentiation to obtain a confluent layer of MNE in ALI. Furthermore, we established MNE as an infectious disease model using Bordetella bronchiseptica, a broad-host spectrum airway pathogen of various animals, including mice. B. bronchiseptica efficiently attached to and colonized the apical face of the MNE, followed by proliferation and disruption of the MNE barrier. Immunostaining indicated that B. bronchiseptica bound cilia of MNE, as they do in vivo in mice. Our results highlight the primary MNE as a powerful tool for studying the interaction between respiratory bacteria and airway epithelia.
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-63086-x.

PMID:
43019159
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Nov 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement