Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Beyond frictionless access: a testable downstream accountability framework for the WHO pathogen access and benefit-sharing annex.

Created on 13 Nov 2026

Authors

Qi Shao

Published in

Journal of global health. Volume 16. Pages 03036. Nov 13, 2026. Epub Nov 13, 2026.

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) Pandemic Agreement depends on a workable Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS) annex that can reconcile rapid pathogen sharing with equitable access to pandemic-related benefits. This viewpoint presents a testable downstream accountability proposal rather than a description of agreed PABS rules. Article 12 already establishes the PABS system, requires the annex to address traceability, provides for legally binding contracts with participating manufacturers, and sets a target for WHO access to 20% of real-time production during a pandemic emergency. The proposal developed here adds an operational downstream trigger, persistent provenance identifiers, pass-through contractual duties, transparent compliance review, and pooled allocation. Routine public-health and non-commercial scientific access would remain rapid and low-friction, and obligations would arise when documented PABS use enters defined product-oriented, intellectual-property, regulatory, licensing, manufacturing, or commercial activity. Persistent identifiers would document provenance, not legal causation, while pooled benefit sharing would avoid sequence-by-sequence valuation. The model also acknowledges unresolved questions of legal authority, national access and benefit-sharing law, allocation governance, non-participating manufacturers, and political acceptability that require negotiation and prospective testing.

PMID:
43023586
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Nov 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement